Tag

politics

Obamacare? Isn’t That Socialized Medicine?

By | Health, The Global Is Local | No Comments

A recent trip up the East Coast to visit family and friends presented a brief but intense glimpse into the debate that still rages around the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, now often referred to as Obamacare, even by the President himself.

Some aunts were very enthusiastic, some suspicious, some entirely opposed, and everyone confused. Many people I talked to — friends, family, and brief acquaintances — had some facts that they were holding onto firmly, which often informed their overall opinion. Some facts were more factual than others, but given the scope of the legislation and the broader health care debate, this is hardly surprising. A representative of the Kaiser Family Foundation health news branch was on NPR this morning, and she pointed out that many of those that the law is likely to benefit most don’t even know that they will soon be eligible for coverage.

If you have concerns about your own eligibility and how to move forward, I recommend Leanne’s post, A Guide to Shopping for Health Exchange Insurance Plans, that ChangeEngine published earlier this week. She links to several other resources that could also help further your understanding. But a more cerebral question has now been kicking around in my head for the past 48 hours: if clever, well educated people with lots of resources have a hard time grasping the basic elements of this law, and the implications that will soon be forthcoming, how on earth will someone who has a limited social support network, perhaps limited internet access, and other limitations fare?

I believe that the roll-out of the ACA will have a net societal benefit, but on the individual level, many questions remain. Questions of access, for instance, as I just mentioned, or of equity for those caught in between economic categories: too ‘wealthy’ to qualify for Medicaid, too ‘poor’ to access high quality insurance products. There are answers out there to these questions, and I plan to devote myself to finding as many of them as I can between now and the beginning of October, when the open enrollment begins on state exchanges and Healthcare.gov, the federal portal.

If you have burning questions that you would like to have answered, please put them into the comments section at the bottom of this post. If there are a sufficient number of questions to warrant it, the next edition of this column will be devoted to answering them. If not, I will endeavor to answer the most pressing concerns that I have heard from friends and family over the past week, since I am confident they will apply to just about all of us.

In the meantime, please stay healthy!

A Human Project

By | Art & Social Change, Of Love and Concrete | No Comments

JR is an international street artist who uses portraits to tell stories. His work is not only big in the sense that his canvases are typically measured in meters but his statements are huge!

Portraits of a Generation: Byron, Paris, 20ème arrondissement, 2004

In his early work, Portraits of a Generation, JR captured images of the overlooked population of  youth in the projects of Paris and posted them in highly visible locations throughout the city. In his later work Face 2 Face, he captured images of both parties to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and posted them side by side on the Separation Barrier. His most recent work, The Inside Out Project, is an open invitation to the world to tell their story through portraiture. The Emmerson Collective is using the project as a tool to highlight the stories of the newest residents of the United States.

Inside Out Baltimore: Kristin Stith, Scott Burkholder, Bonnie Schupp photo by Theresa Keil via What Weekly

JR’s work touches upon some of the most divisive topics: poverty, human dignity, the middle east, war, immigration and the list goes on. However, JR refuses to get political and professes that his work is apolitical. How can he do that? JR does so by looking at these circumstances through the lense of values and not as “issues.” He sees his work as telling the story of humanity

“This artistic act is first and foremost a human project”

JR: Women Are Heroes Action in Kibera Slum, Train Passage 5, Kenya, 2009

JR has tapped into the most powerful and important attribute of art. Art is about values!

When art is a place for society to explore our values, it is extremely powerful. By focusing on human story, JR directs our attention to our universal axiom of being human. He gives us dignity and causes us to explore dignity without regard for condition because we all have a story. JR and successful art gets to the root of humanity by using issues not for the sake of an agenda but for the sake of reminding us of the most important things about being human.

Exploring our values is extremely important! In a society, and world, that is hung up on the fleeting nature of issues, we have become overly divided. I dare say that there are values that all people will claim. Life, liberty,  love, the pursuit of happiness … to name a few. There are very few issues or interests that a significant majority would claim (see the current Habor Point TIF issue in Baltimore Maryland.). It is in our values that we will have the opportunity to not only work together, but to live together. The divided world needs to consider the values behind our thoughts and actions. In that exploration we might possibly find the ground big enough for all of us to stand on.

JR is not a politician, but his work is making big bold statements as if he were one. And his work is likely doing more to change the world than politics as usual.

IMAGE CREDIT. [Scott Burkholder June 2013 NYC].

Stand to Reason

By | Education | No Comments

In the wake of tragedy, we scramble to make sense of the senseless, derive meaning from the meaningless, identify causality (or at least, correlation) in the randomness.

We…

politicize
criticize
proselytize
sanitize
quantify
qualify
verify
justify 

the violence.

Our ability to reason is a hallmark of humanity. 

And humans have been trying to make sense of violence among men for thousands of years.

“For as humans are the best of all animals when perfected, so they are the worst when divorced from law and right. The reason is that injustice is most difficult to deal with when furnished with weapons, and the weapons a human being has are meant by nature to go along with prudence and virtue, but it is only too possible to turn them to contrary uses. Consequently, if a human being lacks virtue, he is the most unholy and savage thing, and when it comes to sex and food, the worst. But justice is something political, for right is the arrangement of the political community, and right is discrimination of what is just.”

– Aristotle, Politics

“Hence arose the first obligations of civility even among savages; and every intended injury became an affront; because, besides the hurt which might result from it, the party injured was certain to find in it a contempt for his person, which was often more insupportable than the hurt itself. Thus, as every man punished the contempt shown him by others, in proportion to his opinion of himself, revenge became terrible, and men bloody and cruel.  This is precisely the state reached by most of the savage nations known to us: and it is for want of having made a proper distinction in our ideas, and see how very far they already are from the state of nature, that so many writers have hastily concluded that man is naturally cruel, and requires civil institutions to make him more mild; whereas nothing is more gentle than man in his primitive state, as he is placed by nature at an equal distance from the stupidity of brutes, and the fatal ingenuity of civilised man. Equally confined by instinct and reason to the sole care of guarding himself against the mischiefs which threaten him, he is restrained by natural compassion from doing any injury to others, and is not led to do such a thing even in return for injuries received. For, according to the axiom of the wise Locke, There can be no injury, where there is no property.”

– Rousseau, Second Discourse On the Origin of Inequality

In the wake of tragedy, we search for meaning.

To reason is human.