Tag

new economy Archives - ChangingMedia

Educating for a Chaotic World

By | Social Enterprise, The Thagomizer | 3 Comments

With unemployment remaining a serious issue in the United States, many students are returning to school in hope that it will give them a leg up in the workforce. Formalized education is supposed to confer upon students a higher status that allows for greater opportunities, yet sadly this is not always the case.

Growing up in Michigan, you would always hear people lament of the days when you could graduate high school and go over and get a decent job at the auto plant with a wage large enough to support your family and a decent pension. In fact my high school was strategically located just across the street from a GM plant so young students could graduate and get their union card on the same day. Unfortunately as G. Asenath Andrews, the principal of Catherine Fergueson Academy points out now, “If you don’t finish high school, you can get a job at McDonalds, and if you finish high school, you can get a job at McDonalds.” What’s the incentive for education then, if after twelve years you still find yourself with the same options?

So the question, then, is how do you create an education system that expands a student’s economic options? Perhaps the most direct solution to this problem is job training. For example Youth Build employs low-income youth to build affordable housing in their communities while getting their GED or high school diploma. The youth in the program get on-the-job training and leadership development in the program that prepares them to enter the workforce. At my own high school, General Motors offered full scholarships for students in engineering as long as they promised to work for the company for two years after they finished their schooling. Colleges around the country are also working with industries to create professional programs that help train students for available jobs.

But what happens when the economy shifts again, and the skills you have are no longer applicable? How do you train students not only for the jobs available now but the jobs in the future? That’s where 21st Century Learning comes in, a framework for teaching students the skills they need to succeed in our new economy. Instead of focusing solely on knowledge (i.e. reading and math test scores), they focus on giving students the tools they need to find out and apply information to real world problems.The 21st Century Framework focuses on the 4Cs – Critical thinking and problem solving, Communication, Collaboration, and Creativity and innovation. It shifts the role of a teacher from being a sage on the stage, imparting knowledge to students, to being a guide on the side who helps students find the information for themselves. In this way they are preparing students for the lifetime of learning necessary to succeed in this economy.

One example of 21st Century Learning in action is the Dewitt Creativity Group, which re-imagines a school as a center of creativity for the community. As founders Jason LaFay and Jeff Croley state, “This is an economy that requires people to develop and exercise skills and forms of knowledge such as: critical thinking, technological proficiency, willingness to accept the differences of others, networking, constant reinvention of the self, and the ability to design and implement innovative concepts/practices. Without these skills and forms of knowledge individuals, communities, and countries will fail to prosper.”

To train students for the new economy they’ve turned their classroom into a center of creativity where students work on initiatives such as the Adopt-A-Business program, where students gain real work world experiences by providing creative services to businesses. In this program, students are presented with real-life problems. They have to research, propose, and implement solutions, teaching them how to apply their education to business needs.

While I was working in Detroit, I got to work with Catherine Fergueson Academy, a school for young pregnant women and mothers committed to providing a relevant education that prepares them to succeed. Their school puts their students in real-world work places and engages in discourse and dialogue on setting and reaching their educational goals. One of the first things you’ll notice about the school is they have a working farm in the back where students are trained in how to grow their own food and agribusinesses, how to make a profit selling the products of their harvest. Students take care of bees, an orchard of fruit trees, vegetables, and even goats and rabbits.  The farm teaches them a new way of thinking about the planet and consumption, how to take care of themselves and their family, and how to make money.

In order to become successful in this chaotic economy we need to train our students to become part of what Fast Company calls Generation Flux. “What defines GenFlux is a mind-set that embraces instability, that tolerates–and even enjoys–recalibrating careers, business models, and assumptions.” From the earliest age, young people are asked to identify what “they want to be when they grow up” but what happens if the world no longer needs automobile workers or firefighters? Members of Generation Flux need to be able to pick up new skills quickly, solve problems, and make connections to constantly create new opportunities. In order to train this new generation we need schools to become hacker spaces, labs, and incubators where students can experiment, collaborate, research, and apply what they’ve learned.

Today much of my career has been built on working with social media. But when I graduated high school, Facebook was still exclusive to college students and Twitter hadn’t been invented yet. There were no classes on social media in college but I was able to build the knowledge of the new technology on my own and apply what I had learned about best practices in communications to this new medium. To succeed in today’s economy a student needs to be a detective to figure out how to learn whatever skill is relevant to the day’s realites and connect the dots between what is already known. We need new systems of education that are focused on building skills for the modern workplace and once again providing an education that opens doors for new economic opportunities.

IMAGE CREDIT: Courtesy of Bill Owen

Toward a Better World

By | Social Enterprise, The Thagomizer | No Comments

Recently I was at a breakfast with social entrepreneurs where we were asked “what do we mean by a ‘better Baltimore?'” It is something we all talk about, it’s embedded in the mission statements of our companies and nonprofits, but what does a better Baltimore actually look like? Happier people? Economic opportunity for all? Healthier physical, emotional, and social well being?

For that matter what do we mean by a “better world?” What are the metrics for determining whether or not we are effectively improving lives or if we are changing anything at all?  This question was first voiced by Angelique and it resonates with all of the work we discuss on ChangeEngine. How can we tell whether anything we promote, propose, point out, or implement actually has an effect on the community?

The social change field has gotten better at determining organizational impact. Every nonprofit nowadays seems to be working on a logic model or theory of change. However I think in order to truly measure impact effectively we need a universal measure that:

  • is a relatively objective system of measurement that allows us to effectively compare models of social change and determine failure as well as success.
  • examines the whole person and allows for collaboration. People don’t live in silos. Food effects education which effects economic opportunity, etc. In the end what makes a person or a community better and how do we measure that end result?
  • allows us to track social change trends for communities, cities, countries, and the world.

In the economic sphere of social change the universal measure is profit. I think profit has become the bottom line for most of our work because we believed in the American dream, a theory of change that suggested by increasing profit we could increase our purchasing power which would allow us to access the innovations that would make our lives easier and thus make us happier people. If you’ve read my other blogs here, you’ll know that I don’t think that’s true. I think there are ways to meet our needs without money and I think happiness isn’t measured purely by one’s bank account.

Yet the question of what we should measure is as difficult as trying to determine the meaning of life. Then you have the Herculean task of trying to figure out how to measure it.

There have been some attempts. Many people are familiar with the Bhutanese  system to combine measures of spiritual and material development into a measure called Gross National Happiness (GNH). in 2006, Med Jones of the International Institute of Management proposed a second-generation GNH measure that used the following metrics to determine happiness:

  1. Economic wellness: Indicated via direct survey and statistical measurement of economic metrics such as consumer debt, average income to consumer price index ratio and income distribution.
  2. Environmental wellness: Indicated via direct survey and statistical measurement of environmental metrics such as pollution, noise and traffic.
  3.  Physical wellness: Indicated via statistical measurement of physical health metrics such as severe illnesses.
  4.  Mental wellness: Indicated via direct survey and statistical measurement of mental health metrics such as usage of antidepressants and rise or decline of psychotherapy patients.
  5. Workplace wellness: Indicated via direct survey and statistical measurement of labor metrics such as jobless claims, job change, workplace complaints and lawsuits.
  6. Social wellness: Indicated via direct survey and statistical measurement of social metrics such as discrimination, safety, divorce rates, complaints of domestic conflicts and family lawsuits, public lawsuits, crime rates.
  7. Political wellness: Indicated via direct survey and statistical measurement of political metrics such as the quality of local democracy, individual freedom, and foreign conflicts.

Another measure is called National Accounts of Well Being, developed by the New Economy Foundation. They use the scientific definition of “subjective well-being” which suggests in addition to experiencing good feelings people need:

  • a sense of individual vitality
  • to undertake activities which are meaningful, engaging, and which make them feel competent and autonomous
  • a stock of inner resources to help them cope when things go wrong and be resilient to changes beyond their immediate control.

They also believe that it is crucial that people feel a sense of relatedness to other people so in addition to measuring the individual aspects of well-being they also look at the degree of which people have supportive relationships and a sense of connection with others. They have identified seven main components of well being which they measure using national Well-Being profiles.

These measures are just two examples of systems that have the potential to help us define the end result of social change and measure our effect on people and communities.

And now a word from our sponsors…If you have been waiting for a chance to meet me in person your time has come. I will be the Mesh Baltimore Skillshare on March 2 waxing poetic on “How to Bring Your Quirk to Social Media.” After you pump me for information on creating a wacky, bizarre, and totally awesome social media presence, you can attend sessions on writing about food, organizing your life, and homebrewing. Check out Mesh Baltimore and sign up for the Skillshare here.

But wait there’s more! I’m teaming up with UGive.org for a Tweet Chat on “Marketing Your Social Enterprise” on March 6th at 3pm EST. If you share my passion for social enterprise you will not want to miss this discussion! Sign up using EventBrite or just join us using the hashtag #HowDoUGive.

 

IMAGE CREDIT. Courtesy of mlcastle.

Sharing is Caring

By | Social Enterprise, The Thagomizer | 3 Comments

A relationship-based economy asks us to rethink our assets, both what they are and how we use them. In my last post I talked about how timebanking allows us to take advantage of our intangible assets. This week I want to talk about how we can take advantage of our own and our community’s physical assets, better known as “stuff.”

Think of your house. How much of your stuff goes unused on a daily, weekly, monthly, or perhaps even on an annual basis? Now imagine if you could get something in exchange for sharing those items when you’re not using them. Imagine if you could have borrowed those items from someone else in the first place and spared yourself the expense of having to buy your own. The infographic below shows how your home might be a secret cash cow with new websites that facilitate sharing:

Collaborative-Consumption-Big

A perfect example of an underutilized asset is your car. In North America, most people only use their car 8 percent of the time. That leaves a lot of time when it’s sitting around and could be used by someone else. RelayRides allows users to rent their car to car-less people in their area. Another car-sharing company, ZipCar allows people to ditch the car all together and rent vehicles by the hour when they need them.

Perhaps my favorite sharing start-up is Karma. For most of the day my wifi at home sits unused. Karma is wireless system where you pay by gigabytes used. What’s great is that anyone else can log into my home hotspot and pay a fee to use it. If that happens I get a credit that I can use at my own hotspot or anywhere else I find Karma. Not only does Karma open up my hotspot to others but it opens up tons of new places I can go to access wifi as well.

When I think of unused gadgets in my home, my thoughts automatically go to the kitchen. While I love my pasta maker, tortilla press, and ice cream maker, the truth is I don’t use them every day or even every week. Imagine having a cooking library where I could rent these things out when I need them. There are already tool libraries around the country where people can check out the tools they need. Really, how much use can you get out of a tile saw once you’ve finished your bathroom renovation?

The sharing economy is not only transforming how we live but how we work.  In co-working spaces people come together to share office space and supplies. Recently, I had a chance to visit Virtually Sisters, a new co-working space in Staunton, Virginia. Artists, consultants, nonprofit staff, entrepreneurs, and sundry others come together to share a store front that is transformed into an office space, a meeting room, an art gallery, bike parking, a pop-up retail store, a classroom, a production studio and more. The space allows everyone to be able afford a store front on main street.

Another great co-working idea is Incu-BaKe, an industrial kitchen shared by food entrepreneurs. In addition to a kitchen, Incu-BaKe clients are able to share ideas, connections to local suppliers, and business clients. Co-working spaces helps businesses succeed by cutting down on costs, building collaborations, and accessing new resources.

With the current state of the economy many of us are forced to go without a lot of luxuries  A sharing economy increases the resources available to people in the community without actually creating new resources. It’s a perfect example of the ability of a relationship-based economy to increase prosperity without dramatically raising income. It lowers the cost and increases the accessibility to the tools we want or need for life and work. Furthermore it builds relationships where we can share more than just stuff, we can share ideas, networks, and friendships.

By sharing we rethink prosperity: no longer is it something to be built and enjoyed by the individual, but something we can build together. Through sharing we can find and use our community’s assets to meet our needs and meet new people along the way, which improves the quality of life for everyone. It’s a great example of how the solution to the economic crisis may not solely be figuring out how to increase the amount of monetary wealth a person has, but rethinking how we use the wealth that already surrounds us.

Towards a New Economy

By | Social Enterprise, The Thagomizer | 3 Comments

Photo: Woods Pierce

The economy is the most talked about topic of this election. It should be. I grew up in Michigan right next to a GM plant and graduated from a high school across the street from another. By the time I graduated from college both of those plants were closed. The 7.8 percent unemployment rate is not a statistic for most of us, it is part of our daily existence.

“Economy,” comes from ancient Greek and literally means “management of the home.” The root word “oikos” is a broad definition of home, including our family, house, our household goods, and our entire private life. In its purest form an economy is how we manage our daily existence and meet our needs for food, shelter, love, and comfort.

The economy does not mean “how do I make more money?” but “how do I live?” To me that is a question that is far more interesting and useful. During this recession many of the people in our community are having trouble meeting basic needs and I don’t think we have to wait until the outcome of this election to start solving this problem.

Read More