I shy away from criticizing Obamacare too much because I think it provides some major improvements to our health care system. Personally, the law has positively impacted me — more free preventative care, more services covered and longer coverage. But lately I’ve become a bit fed up with my own health insurance and doctors’ visits, and it’s hard not to ignore all the negativity surrounding the law. Obamacare isn’t the problem here. It’s definitely not the solution either. Rather, Obamacare is kind of like a band-aid that distracts you from the real problem — a health care system that perpetuates inequality.
Ironically, this past year I met a lot of bright-eyed Johns Hopkins students who came to be a part of the “best” health care system in the world. And our medical education is arguably the best in the world (thanks to the 1910 Flexner Report that set Johns Hopkins Medical School as the gold standard for medical education and compared all other schools to it.) There’s no doubt our doctors can do amazing things. A news report stated that a Chicago suburban hospital has a 97% survival rate for gunshot wounds that enter the ER. Considering that a bullet can enter your upper torso and exit in your lower torso, damaging every organ in between, that is a spectacular rate. It’s the long-term care after the fact where we drop the ball.
Here’s an all-too-typical story: a patient is admitted to the hospital, can’t get out of bed for weeks on end and when it’s time to leave, they no longer have the strength to walk. Patients lie in their hospital bed for weeks eating crappy hospital food and their only option for exercise is to be the creepy person walking up and down the hallway in their hospital gown dragging the IV stand. Healthcare in the United States is amazing at the quick-fix, but when it comes to helping a patient overcome root causes of illness, we don’t really try. There’s rarely any sufficient patient education or measures taken to prevent re-admittance to the hospital.
What’s even worse is what can come after the hospital — a nursing home. No one wants to be in one. Not even the workers like being there. If you can’t afford at-home help, off you go to spend most of your time eating more crappy food and watching more TV in bed.
Patients at all hospitals should be receiving holistic care. Take the New York program that allows doctors to prescribe vegetables, for instance. Instead, many patients are being subjected to a long-standing though theoretically taboo practice called “patient dumping” where patients at one health facility are forced to another, usually because of their insurance status. Though hospitals are required to treat whoever enters their doors under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act of 1986, patient dumping still occurs, even as horrible as busing people to another state.
Soon about 30 million more people will have health insurance, but it’s scary to think that “patient dumping” might still occur even if the majority of Americans are insured. Will you be referred to a crappier facility if you have the cheapest health insurance? That’s the thing with our health care system — if you have more money, you receive better and faster care. There will be minimum benefits thanks to Obamacare, but people with more money will still be able to afford better health insurance even with the “Cadillac” tax for the more exhaustive insurance plans. In Germany, health insurance will cover spa days and yoga if your doctor prescribes it. Why can’t everyone have benefits that would get a “Cadillac” tax? If only we could take a step back and realize the care we’ve been delivering is actually not the best in the world, then maybe we could start on the path to the equal holistic care we all need and deserve.
